
David Zierler
I arrived at this project because I was interested in tracing the development of an idea.
We are frequently told that Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring “launched” the environmental movement after its publication in 1962. But when one looks closely at Carson’s narrative, it is clear that her understanding of environmental issues was decidedly national in character.
Carson’s concern about humankind’s abilities to destroy natural environs took place upon an explicitly American backdrop. And yet modern discourse on environmental politics and problems is bounded by no such distinctions. Our culture takes at face value that deforestation in the Amazon, acid rain in Eastern Europe, or the ozone hole over the Antarctic are not simply problems isolated to those areas—they are global in scope.
As a historian, I was seeking answers to explain this intellectual transformation throughout the latter half of the twentieth century.
As it stood, there was a gap in the logic between modern global environmentalism and the credit normally bestowed upon Rachel Carson. This led to my work on Agent Orange and Vietnam.
I think one of the reasons that the story of “Ecocide” resonated so powerfully at the end of the 1960s was that the sheer destructive power of herbicidal warfare clarified for many people what humankind was capable of doing. The vast moonscapes of formerly lush rainforest (images of which appear in my book) presented an eco-dystopic harbinger of the future.
For Americans, it mattered less that this program took place on the other side of the globe; more compelling was the speed and relative ease with which massive forests could be wiped out.
Further, the destructive power of Agent Orange set it apart from nearly all other forms of industrial environmental degradation of the modern era. Whereas nearly all environmental problems are the unnecessary (but generally unavoidable) byproduct of human labor, environmental destruction for the sake of environmental destruction was the point of Agent Orange and herbicidal warfare. Engineered across the backdrop of an unpopular war, the spray program became what I see as the tipping point by which environmental thinking and politics assumed an international scope.
Editor: Erind Pajo

David Zierler The Invention of Ecocide: Agent Orange, Vietnam, and the Scientists who Changed the Way We Think About the Environment University of Georgia Press 252 pages, 6 x 9 inches ISBN 978 0820338279
Available here →August 1, 2011
20110801-zierler-david-ecocide-agent-orange-vietnam-scientists-environment-2
The wide angle

Benjamin E. Akselrad
David Zierler is an Historian for the U.S. Department of State, where his research focuses on U.S. policy during the Soviet intervention in Afghanistan. He received his Ph.D. from Temple University and was a visiting scholar at Yale University while completing the dissertation. Besides The Invention of Ecocide, featured in his Rorotoko interview, David is the author of numerous essays and articles, and he is now at work on a new book project on foreign policy and journalism from World War I to Persian Gulf II. He lives in Washington, D.C. with his wife and daughter.
pulls againstpulls alongside
Modern environmentalism got its global scope from the campaign against herbicidal warfare in Vietnam, not from Rachel Carson.
Against SP · 9/11 did not change American storytelling, and the incisive work on it came from documentary filmmakers, not Hollywood. On: A crisis of sufficient severity produces reform of the system that caused it
Against AS · Two centuries of psychiatry are a sequence of desperate remedies, and today's biological consensus is the latest one. On: A crisis of sufficient severity produces reform of the system that caused it
Against BK · A constitutional crisis over the presidency will be settled by political posture, not by the best legal analysis. On: A crisis of sufficient severity produces reform of the system that caused it
Alongside TB · Twelfth-century Europe had no government, only lordship. On: A crisis of sufficient severity produces reform of the system that caused it
Alongside FH · The chemistry that pushed back famine and disease and the chemistry that killed millions are one enterprise. On: A crisis of sufficient severity produces reform of the system that caused it
Alongside NB · American writers between 1870 and 1920 borrowed the shock, speed and danger of the mass culture they denounced. On: A crisis of sufficient severity produces reform of the system that caused it
Most threads on Rorotoko begin with our invitation. Any thread can begin with a proposal: you write it with the same prompts every thread answers, and we review it.
Propose a thread →