Nancy Leys Stepan
January 2, 2012

On the continued appeal of disease eradication

One of the strange things about eradication is how it repeatedly arises, phoenix-like, from its setbacks.Fred Lowe Soper paradoxically embraced the cause of disease eradication in the 1930s, just as the Rockefeller Foundation abandoned the project. Smallpox eradication was re-born in 1967, just before malaria eradication was given up by WHO. Polio eradication was launched in 1988, just when many public health experts rejected eradication altogether, in favor of concentrating on primary health care.What explains the continued appeal of eradication, despite the rarity of success?

Editor: Erind Pajo

Nancy Leys Stepan

Nancy Leys Stepan

Nancy Leys Stepan started her working life as a science journalist, then qualified as a historian of science and medicine. She is Professor of History Emeritus at Columbia University, and has previously taught at Yale, Oxford, and the Central European University. Besides Eradication, featured on Rorotoko, her books include “The Hour of Eugenics” (co-winner of the Berkshire Prize), Picturing Tropical Nature, The Idea of Race in Science.

Health & Medicine
1900-1945, Cold War era
How science gets made
Tomorrow on Rorotoko
Get the monthly stitch
One email a month with everything Rorotoko published. No paywalls. No selling your data.
Subscribe

No paywalls. No selling your data.

Support this awesome independent project.