Bryan W. Van Norden

Taking Back Philosophy

The late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia once dismissed the teachings of Confucius as “the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie.” In doing so, he was expressing the perspective of a long line of conservative thinkers who think that “so-called philosophy” outside the West is nothing but shallow platitudes. For example, in his bestselling The Closing of the American Mind, Allan Bloom claimed that contemporary colleges and universities were corrupting the morals of their students by undermining their faith in the classic texts of Western civilization.

In contrast, Taking Back Philosophy: A Multicultural Manifesto argues that education must become multicultural in order to maintain its contemporary relevance. China is an increasingly important geopolitical power, and President Xi Jinping routinely praises Confucian philosophers. In India, the dominant political party espouses a version of Hindu nationalism, grounded in classical Vedanta philosophy.

The US population is increasingly ethnically diverse, and within a few decades whites of European descent will be a minority. Can we afford not to learn about philosophy outside the European tradition?

I got a PhD in Chinese philosophy from Stanford University in 1991. Since then, I have been fighting to convince my colleagues to teach Chinese and other non-European philosophies. I have given carefully argued examples of the sophistication of Chinese philosophy.

I have provided model course guides and reading lists. I have run informational sessions at conferences. A handful of institutions, like Vassar College, where I have taught for 20 years, and Yale-NUS College in Singapore, where I am currently teaching, have been open to multicultural philosophy. However, most have not. The vast majority of philosophers have simply ignored the irrefutable evidence for the existence and high quality of Chinese, Indian, African, and Indigenous American philosophy. I hope that my fellow philosophers will read my book and finally be convinced. But if they are not, I think it is time for students and the general public to demand a multicultural approach to philosophy.

Editor: Judi Pajo

Taking Back Philosophy

Taking Back Philosophy

Bryan W. Van Norden Taking Back Philosophy: A Multicultural Manifesto Columbia University Press 248 pages, 5.5 x 8.4 inches ISBN 978 0231184373

Available here →

The rest of this thread

1

In a nutshell

December 11, 2017

2

The wide angle

December 11, 2017

3

A close-up

December 11, 2017

Bryan W. Van Norden

2016 Vassar College / Karl Rabe

Bryan W. Van Norden

Bryan W. Van Norden lives in Singapore, where he is Kwan Im Thong Hood Cho Temple Professor at Yale-NUS College. He is also Chair Professor in Philosophy in the School of Philosophy at Wuhan University (PRC) and Professor of Philosophy at Vassar College (USA). A recipient of a Fulbright Fellowship, a National Endowment for the Humanities Grant, and a Mellon Fellowship, Van Norden has been honored as one of The Best 300 Professors in the US by The Princeton Review. Professor Van Norden has published nine books on Chinese and comparative philosophy, including Introduction to Classical Chinese Philosophy and (with Justin Tiwald) Readings in Later Chinese Philosophy. Professor Van Norden is also a frequent contributor of opinion pieces as a public intellectual, and has written about US politics, public policy, and international relations for The New York Times, The Huffington Post, The Straits Times, and 联合早报, among other publications.

Pull this thread

pulls againstpulls alongside

Western philosophy's refusal to teach Chinese, Indian and African thought is a lingering effect of Kantian racial theory.

Against AW · Literature yields existential and sentient knowledge, and that, not any political payoff, is why we read it. On: A canon records real artistic quality rather than the machinery that assembled it

Against BB · Nabokov is a maximalist, and readers who halt at modernist irony miss what makes him write. On: A canon records real artistic quality rather than the machinery that assembled it

Alongside TW · Jazz history, told as a succession of God-like male heroes, enforces masculine and heterosexual norms. On: A canon records real artistic quality rather than the machinery that assembled it

Alongside TS · What passes for art history is criticism in disguise, and there will be a period when Rembrandt is not admired. On: A canon records real artistic quality rather than the machinery that assembled it

Alongside DV · Orientalism was canonized without being read through, and Said's own thesis is itself an essentialism. On: A canon records real artistic quality rather than the machinery that assembled it

Alongside TB · Mann's American celebrity was manufactured, and it worked because he was sold as representing a German tradition Nazism had perverted. On: A canon records real artistic quality rather than the machinery that assembled it

Nearby IM · Lévi-Strauss's structuralism and Braudel's longue durée took form through exchange with Brazilian interlocutors at the young University of São Paulo.

Nearby PA · Conservatism has no fixed content, so the American Civil War was a fight between two conservatisms.

See the whole map on Explore →

Know something the rest of us don't?

Most threads on Rorotoko begin with our invitation. Any thread can begin with a proposal: you write it with the same prompts every thread answers, and we review it.

Propose a thread →

No paywalls. No selling your data.

Support this awesome independent project.

or shop the merch →