
Simon Ball
The study of assassination is akin to running a razor blade down the history of international politics: the cut is narrow but long and deep. Assassination reveals statesmen and their servants at their most authentically vulnerable moments – they are, after all, often the people with the most to lose. Assassination: personal, violent, widely reported, strips back layers of self-deception like few other acts.
My own study of assassination started, as historical research should, with curiosity occasioned by a different project. I was researching the attempts by Britain to limit the international trade in small arms from the Edwardian period to the twenty-first century when I came across this statement: semi-automatic pistols were ‘devilish weapons’ because ‘any fool can shoot a Viceroy or a police inspector.’ I wondered if they could, and thus the trail started winding through many hundreds of assassinations.
Curator: Bora Pajo

Simon Ball Death to Order: A Modern History of Assassination Yale University Press 464 pages, 6 x 9 inches, ISBN 9780300258042
Available here →October 16, 2025
20251016-ball-simon-on-death-to-order-history-of-assassination-2
The wide angle

Simon Ball has been the University’s Chair of International History & Politics at the University of Leeds since 2012. He previously served as Professor of Contemporary History at the University of Glasgow. As Academic Integrity Lead in the School of History, his research centers on the Cold War, the Second World War, British politics, assassination in international politics, and twentieth-century secret intelligence. Professor Ball edited War in History and sits on the editorial boards of Intelligence & National Security and Diplomacy & Statecraft. His books include Death To Order (2025), Secret History (2020), Alamein (2016; Folio Society 2022), The Bitter Sea (2009), The Guardsmen (2004), The Cold War (1998; reprinted 2009), and The Bomber in British Strategy (1995; Routledge 2022). He collaborates widely beyond academia, including authoring a 2022 REF Impact Case Study.
pulls againstpulls alongside
Modern assassination is a state phenomenon, because the reaction of states is what gives political murder its charge.
Against BB · Seventeenth-century Rome had a deliberate papal meat program, Urban VIII driving consumption to a pound a day per person. On: Absence and silence in the record are themselves evidence
Against JA · Capitalism is a culture, neither inevitable nor natural, so it takes a different shape in every country that adopts it. On: Large historical outcomes are contingent choices rather than the working-out of deep causes
Against JB · Achilles' immortality at Leuke is early, and on his afterlife Homer is the odd man out. On: Absence and silence in the record are themselves evidence
Against PW · The Thirty Years War was neither inevitable nor a religious conflict. On: Large historical outcomes are contingent choices rather than the working-out of deep causes
Alongside WH · The Greeks and Romans were more skeptical of their dreams than credulous. On: Absence and silence in the record are themselves evidence
Alongside IH · Humans head toward ever more stuff because when things fail the fix is more things, and that cannot be reversed. On: Large historical outcomes are contingent choices rather than the working-out of deep causes
Alongside HW · The Sea Venture chronicles were an important catalyst for The Tempest, and two Powhatans were almost surely aboard. On: Absence and silence in the record are themselves evidence
Alongside ME · Economics explains why North and South clashed better than slavery does. On: Large historical outcomes are contingent choices rather than the working-out of deep causes
Most threads on Rorotoko begin with our invitation. Any thread can begin with a proposal: you write it with the same prompts every thread answers, and we read it.
Propose a thread →