The Object Lessons series excels at connecting objects to larger implications. Ultimately, I hope my readers will become more curious about how something as banal as lipstick connects to sexuality, power, gender identity, and class.

Even though many women don’t wear lipstick regularly, sales haven’t declined. That contradiction is fascinating. I see the book as a provocation—one that leads to productive arguments between women and challenges men’s frequent discomfort with the concept of femininity as artifice. I hope queer readers gravitate toward the book as well; lipstick itself is rich with queer potential, which Lipstick explores at length. Beauty culture is tied to so many systems of power and, for that reason alone, warrants serious critical attention.

Lipstick is a catalyst for thinking about the difference between art and artifice, and how that distinction is gendered. I’m also researching glamour, and see the book as part of a larger conversation which I’d like to expand upon in the future. I hope beauty culture can also be taken more seriously in the United States, academically. I hope Lipstick contributes to a more rigorous intellectual embrace of questions related to femininity.

I dedicated the book to my mother, who rarely wears makeup, but supported my interest in all forms of self-expression when I was young. The older I get, the more I appreciate how tolerant she was in this respect. I hope the book prompts both tolerance and curiosity for different forms of feminine expression.